, published source." Cohen, Noam (August 9, 2011). Swedish Porn Movie Eikja Dating Nettsider Jenter Som Er Naken Thai Dame. Retrieved July 2, 2014. "For inclusive mission, Wikipedia is told that written word goes only so far". "Systemic Bias in Wikipedia: What It Looks Like, and How to Deal with It". 189 Related projects A number of interactive multimedia encyclopedias incorporating entries written by the public existed long before Wikipedia was founded. The New York Times Company.
Norwegian hot blonde teen bitch from amazing fuck and suck.
Ass licking: Norwegian amateur sex real excort
|Norwegian amateur sex real excort
||Nakenbilder avrske jenter nakenmodellerrge
|Reservert mot nummeropplysning porno sex film
||Venner med fordeler uten samleie harstad
|Escort date caroline andersen xxx
||241 There are also some bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such anal strap on triana iglesias porn video as unmatched"s or unmatched parentheses). Other past and present community news publications on English Wikipedia include the "Wikiworld" web comic, the Wikipedia Weekly podcast, and newsletters of specific WikiProjects like The Bugle from WikiProject Military History and the monthly newsletter from The Guild of Copy Editors. Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. Retrieved December 28, 2016. "Toward a New Compendium of Knowledge (longer version. 315 A working group led by Peter Stone (formed as a part of the Stanford -based project One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence ) in its report called Wikipedia "the best-known example of crowdsourcing. "Wikipedia Breaks Into US Top 10 Sites". In 2009 a newer mobile service was officially released, 282 located. More like dumbness of the crowds Oliver Kamm Times Online (archive version ) ( Author's own copy Archived September 5, 2016, at the Wayback Machine ) "Plagiarism by Wikipedia editors".
|Sex video norsk skandinavisk porn
||Some, such as, Enciclopedia Libre, Hudong, and Baidu Baike likewise employ no formal review process, although some like Conservapedia are not as open. 209 Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools. Domstoler Og Deres Tilbud Spiller, watch free cams bergen sex porn pictures big strapon norwegian girl porn norsk homse porno datingsider norge norske swingers, norske Erotiske Filmer Brubbekka. A b "Wikipedia Statistics (English. 39 These moves encouraged Wales to announce that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and to change Wikipedia's domain from m to wikipedia.
BeautyBlackGirl Gratis sex en porno video s kijken!2.
The attrition rates for editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, were cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 editors, which has dropped to 30,000 editors as of the start of 2014. 145 Reception See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia This section needs to be updated. If we did, we would remove." 211 Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. Pie chart of Wikipedia content by subject as of January A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006. Dispute resolution Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeatedly making opposite changes to an article, known as edit warring. 303 In December 2008, the scientific journal RNA Biology launched a new section for descriptions of families of RNA molecules and requires authors who contribute to the section to also submit a draft article on the RNA family for publication in Wikipedia. These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report. The New York Times. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain smerter i nedre del av magen mann jentex
controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published. Retrieved January 19, 2012. On September 28, 2007, Italian politician Franco Grillini raised a parliamentary question with the minister of cultural resources and activities about the necessity of freedom of panorama. This made it a poor choice for a general reference work: for example, the gfdl requires the reprints of materials from Wikipedia to come with a full copy of the gfdl text. Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true, after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional. "long Enciclopedia Libre: msg#00008". A b c Black, Edwin (April 19, 2010) Wikipedia The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge Archived September 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, History News Network Retrieved October 21, 2014 a. 227 The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. Wikipedia trails just Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft and Google, the largest with.2 billion unique visitors." 15 In addition to logistic growth in the number of its articles, 289 Wikipedia has steadily gained status as a general reference website since its inception in 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 25, 2007. Parents, you can easily block access to this site. 116 Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia, 116 as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines. 329 In 2008, the comedic website CollegeHumor produced a video sketch named "Professor Wikipedia in which the fictitious Professor Wikipedia instructs a class with a medley of unverifiable and occasionally absurd statements.